How to get the best value from MMC

Early‑engaged, standardised MMC delivers faster, higher‑quality homes without sacrificing design character.

16th Jan 2026

12.00 - 13:00

Webinar Overview

Join us for an insightful session exploring modern methods of construction (MMC) and their role in delivering efficient, high-quality projects. We’ll begin with a brief introduction to the Donaldson Group and Timber Systems, followed by an overview of the different MMC categories and how timber frame fits within this landscape.

The webinar will also cover the RIBA design stages, highlighting where MMC adds the most value, referencing the “opportunity curve” to show the benefits of early supplier involvement. Finally, we’ll discuss standardisation in design, demonstrating that it doesn’t mean compromise, with a range of real-world examples.

Modern Methods of Construction are defined by multiple categories that shift labour and materials off‑site, measured through pre‑manufactured value. Timber frame demonstrates how this approach enables rapid, precise assembly, delivering weather‑tight structures in a single day. These benefits depend on early engagement, clear design freeze, and coordinated design for manufacture and assembly. By standardising hidden structural components while maintaining flexibility in external appearance, projects can achieve efficiency without compromising placemaking or architectural quality. Successful adoption relies on skills, training, and robust assurance frameworks that address procurement risk, trade familiarity, and confidence. When these elements align, MMC delivers faster programmes, higher quality, and more predictable outcomes.

 

Recording & Reflections

 
  • How do MMC categories work, and how is PMV practically calculated…
     
  • What timber frame steps deliver roofs on site within one day…
     
  • When should teams engage MMC advisors to maximise DfMA value…
     
  • How can standardisation preserve character while improving construction efficiency and outcomes…
     
  • Which factors accelerate MMC adoption while managing risk and capability gaps…

Learning Points

1. Seven MMC categories measured by PMV show value of off‑site construction.
Modern Methods of Construction are defined across seven categories, ranging from fully volumetric systems to panelised structures, non‑structural assemblies, additive manufacturing, and productivity‑enhancing site technologies. Together, these categories describe how much construction activity can be shifted off‑site. This shift is measured using pre‑manufactured value, which compares off‑site materials and labour against total project inputs. Traditional masonry housing typically achieves PMV in the high‑30s or low‑40s. Open‑panel timber frame increases this into the mid‑40s, while closed‑panel systems with factory‑fitted windows and floor cassettes can exceed 50–55%. Volumetric systems reach the highest values, though groundworks always remain on site.

2. Prepared slabs and craned assemblies enable weather‑tight structures in one day.
Timber frame construction achieves major productivity gains through sequencing and precision. After foundations are completed, sole plates are installed early to ensure accurate setting‑out. Roofs are then assembled at ground level, reducing work at height. On delivery day, the roof is craned off the plot, wall panels are installed directly from delivery vehicles, floor cassettes are placed, and upper‑storey panels follow. The pre‑assembled roof is then lifted back into position. For typical low‑rise housing, this entire process can be completed in a single day, creating a weather‑tight structure immediately. Compared with masonry construction, which may take months to reach roof level, this dramatically shortens programmes and enables faster follow‑on trades.

3. Early engagement enables design freeze, coordination, and full DfMA benefits.
The greatest value from MMC comes when system providers are engaged early, ideally at RIBA Stages 1 and 2. At this point, manufacturers can influence structural layouts, joist directions, service routes, and foundation strategies. Early coordination allows design freeze to occur sooner than in traditional construction, aligning manufacturing, procurement, and site logistics. When MMC is introduced late—after technical masonry designs are complete—systems can still be delivered, but many benefits are lost. Late engagement limits optimisation, increases risk, and often results in higher cost or longer lead times. Early DfMA enables better cost certainty, improved buildability, and smoother integration between factory production and site assembly.

4. Standardised structural cores enable efficiency while façades preserve design character.
Standardisation does not require uniform or bland housing. The key is to standardise hidden structural components while allowing visible variation. Studies show excessive variation in stairs, window openings, and storey heights creates inefficiency, waste, and manufacturing complexity. By rationalising these elements into a limited set of repeatable components, productivity increases significantly. External appearance can still vary through materials, colours, roof forms, and detailing. Pattern‑book approaches demonstrate that high‑quality, award‑winning neighbourhoods can be created from standardised cores. This approach reduces waste, improves factory throughput, simplifies procurement, and lowers site risk—while preserving architectural identity and local character.

5. Training, assurance, and skills overcome adoption, procurement, and perception barriers.
MMC adoption depends as much on skills, habits, and understanding as on technology. Regions with established timber frame traditions benefit from multi‑skilled trades and smoother workflows. Barriers include procurement uncertainty, concerns about warranties and mortgages, and lack of familiarity among follow‑on trades. These challenges are addressed through early engagement, training, and clear assurance frameworks. Structured learning platforms help designers, commercial teams, and site operatives understand how MMC differs from traditional construction. Industry bodies provide fire‑tested systems and defined limits for design changes, improving confidence. Large‑scale exemplars demonstrate that MMC can deliver speed, quality, and safety when supported by the right processes and capabilities.

Presenter Bio

John Smith

John is a real industry expert with over 30 years' experience in the timber frame industry and recently joiner the board of the Structural Timber Association. He has worked on some of the largest timber frame projects in the UK, and was instrumental in the development of the innovative Sigma® II closed panel build system. He has also played a key role in writing and publishing a number of technical and commercial papers for the timber frame industry.

James Lund-Lack

Chair of the Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB)

James Lund-Lack is an experienced construction professional and strategic advisor with a strong record in governance, operational growth, and risk management across complex projects. He serves as Chair of the Chartered Institute of Building (CIOB) for the Bristol and South West region, leading governance, compliance, and industry engagement for the  members. With extensive experience in both executive and non-executive roles, James combines commercial insight with a collaborative approach to board leadership, helping to align business strategy, stakeholder interests, and sustainable performance across the construction sector.

Event organised and promoted in partnership with

GET NOTIFIED ABOUT FUTURE EVENTS 

Subscribe to our FREE email list to get notification of other events we are promoting.

Don't worry we hate spam too so will only send you relevant events.

Unsubscribe anytime.